British Columbia Judgment in Mann vs Ball Defamation Suit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Date: 20190822 Docket: S111913 Registry: Vancouver Between: Michael Mann Plaintiff And: Timothy (“Tim”) Ball Defendants Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Giaschi Oral Reasons for Judgment In Chambers Counsel for the Plaintiff: R. McConchie Counsel for the Defendant, Timothy (“Tim”) Ball: M. Scherr D. Juteau Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, B.C. May 27 and August 22, 2019 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. August 22, 2019 Download PDF This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it..

BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE DR. JUDITH A. CURRY IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR REHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC

INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE Dr. Curry is a prominent climate scientist and former longtime chair of the Georgia Institute of Technology’s School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. Dr. Curry has been a member of the National Research Council’s Climate Research Committee and the United States Department of Energy’s Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee. She has authored three books and nearly two hundred scholarly articles on climate science. Dr. Curry also maintains an active blog, Climate Etc., which provides a forum for climate researchers, academics, technical experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a …

PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF “ENDANGERMENT AND CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE FINDINGS FOR GREENHOUSE GASES UNDER SECTION 202(a) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT”

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY In re: Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171 PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF“ENDANGERMENT AND CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE FINDINGS FOR GREENHOUSE GASES UNDER SECTION 202(a) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT”

An Exchange on Climate Science and Alarm

By Richard S. Lindzen March 2, 2008 Introduction On October 21-22, 2005, the Yale Center for Globalization held a conference on “Global Climate Policy After 2012″. Speakers holding a variety of views addressed the conference, but, as usual, there was little time for actual debate. It was understood that the papers presented at the conference would be published, but, for reasons that I am not privy to, the publication was delayed for over two years. During this interval, papers were, apparently modified, and, in particular, the paper by Rahmstorf was turned into a specific attack on my paper. This would …

AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CLIMATOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS

No. 05-1120 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS , et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY , et al., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CLIMATOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS SALLIE BALIUNAS, JOHN R. CHRISTY, CHRIS DE FREITAS, DAVID LEGATES, ANTHONY LUPO, PATRICK MICHAELS, JOEL SCHWARTZ, AND ROY W. SPENCER IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF CLIMATOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS SALLIE BALIUNAS, JOHN R. CHRISTY, CHRIS DE FREITAS, DAVID LEGATES, ANTHONY LUPO, PATRICK MICHAELS, JOEL SCHWARTZ, AND ROY W. …

CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of our Time

by Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc. On Feb. 2, 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) again uttered its mantra of catastrophe about man-made global warming. After weeks of noisy propaganda,for Policymakers” of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007, was presented in grandiose style in Paris to a crowd of politicians and media, accompanied by a blackout of the Eiffel Tower to show that electric energy is bad. The event induced a tsunami of hysteria that ran around the world. This was probably the main aim of this clearly political paper, prepared by governmental and United Nations bureaucrats, and …